Here ya go Thio Joe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lG5cEik2ABY
bp
On 10/13/2014 11:21 AM, Bill Prince via Af wrote:
What the heck is a cow magnate?
This whole discussion reminds me of the Youtube nerd that shows people
how to make their internet faster by wrapping the ethernet cable
around a pencil or something...
bp
On 10/13/2014 7:33 AM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:
I agree, when it shows up in a major journal things may look a bit
more legit. The whole field has a taint so that may be one reason we
have not seen peer reviewed publications.
But this is one that keeps coming back again and again. Powdered
nickel, treated with special sauce, gives off extra heat when heated.
I find the isotope changes listed in the white paper the most
interesting features. Something is going on.
I would love to insert some nickel filled ceramic rods into my
furnace and cut my gas bill by a third. Better than cow magnets on
your fuel line...
*From:* Chuck Bartosch via Af <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2014 8:19 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Booyah, I still believe
Having formerly been in the field I'm more than skeptical. Of course,
experience can be the bane of innovation. Still, 1.5 MW isn't a low
power, low yield, hard to verify production. Whatever the source of
the result, it's not an artifact (ie, it's presumably either real or
its fraud).
The past well-known announcements of cold fusion, as you know, have
been either fraudulent or badly done science (as in, the effects were
artifacts of poor design, not cold fusion).
What makes me most skeptical is this isn't appearing in a reputable
science journal, like Physical Review Letters (something like this
surely qualify for publication in a high impact journal like PRL).
Or...did I miss something? (Not impossible by any means).
Chuck
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Kade Sullivan via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
You cant get people to buy something without proof it's legit. Of
course they need a third party to validate. They would need a bunch
of cash to make a big enough reactor for it to actually be useful.
You can't just *do* things. It takes time/resources/money, and those
dont come along with out validation.
Not that I'm arguing the point that it's legit or not, as I have no
knowledge of the subject. I'd have to have it independently verified
to offer my opinion :D
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Chuck Bartosch via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
...and for years it's been BS. Can you imagine how rich these
guys would already be if it were real? If it were true, you
really wouldn't need a third party to validate. Just do it and
be insanely wealthy.
Chuck
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 13, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Chuck McCown via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Been following this for years. This is the best paper yet.
*From:* Kade Sullivan via Af <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2014 7:44 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Booyah, I still believe
1 gram of fuel produced 1.5 MEGAWATTS of power over 32 days?
Am I reading that right?
Holy shit!
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Chuck McCown via Af
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/191754-cold-fusion-reactor-verified-by-third-party-researchers-seems-to-have-1-million-times-the-energy-density-of-gasoline
