I look at it more for dense deployments where you have subs right up to the 
tower. Something that goes maybe 2 or 3 miles out at most. They have 30, 40, 
50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 degree antennas. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Gino Villarini via Af" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 9:28:17 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement 




I thinkt he innovative thing here is the waveguide adapter between the radios 
ant the horns/dishes, 


90deg sector has 10db gain.. Way too low I think 







Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
www.aeronetpr.com 
@aeronetpr 






From: " [email protected] " < [email protected] > 
Reply-To: " [email protected] " < [email protected] > 
Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 at 10:18 AM 
To: " [email protected] " < [email protected] > 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement 






The simper Sectors http://simper.rfelements.com/ 
Not clear if the dish is a horn/reflector combination? 



----- GENIAS INTERNET -- www.genias.net ------ 
Stefan Englhardt Email: [email protected] 
Dr. Gesslerstr. 20 D-93051 Regensburg 
Tel: +49 941 942798-0 Fax: +49 941 942798-9 



Von: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] Im Auftrag von Chuck McCown via Af 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2014 16:15 
An: [email protected] 
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement 




Which product are we talking about? The one that looks like a dish has a patch 
array inside the cover. 






From: Ty Featherling via Af 

Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 8:06 AM 

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement 




So you're saying this is more marketing than innovation? 



-Ty 




On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Chuck McCown via Af < [email protected] > wrote: 






Angle is pretty much solely dependent upon gain. So a typical horn is about as 
good as the best patch array or a smaller parabolic reflector. But they are 
worse than both in the mechanical sense. 



The higher the frequency the more practical horns become. 






From: Stefan Englhardt via Af 

Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 1:51 AM 

To: [email protected] 

Subject: [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement 






This is realy something I did not expect: They announce Systems with Horn 
antennas. 
A quite different approach. Their sectors are directional antennas so coverage 
is not as good 
as with traditional antennas (Their marketing argues the opposite). But horn 
antennas 
should have very low sidelobes, a good FB-Ratio and allow small angles. So it 
should be possible 
to make a more dense deployment. 
What make me scare is the big opening where water and ice may cause damage. 






Reply via email to