It doesn't say anything about sync. I will forward the email to the list.
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard via Af Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 7:48 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP PTP Latency I didn't get that email... is that 2ms with GPS sync, or without? It looks to me from the pictures like the force 110 is still using a connectorized radio, so you could easily swap it for a synced radio, if you wanted to use sync for PtP with these antennas. _____ From: Af [[email protected]] on behalf of Rex McGuire via Af [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 5:39 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP PTP Latency >From the press release email I was sent a couple of days ago it stated that one of the key features of release 2.4 ( coming in December of 2014 ) would be low latency of 2 ms in PTP mode. On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Josh Baird via Af <[email protected]> wrote: The new ePMP PTP? Are you talking about the ePMP radios that have been shipping for months now? I wasn't in Vegas this week, so maybe I missed something. On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Matt via Af <[email protected]> wrote: Anyone heard what the new ePMP PTP will have for latency when using GPS sync?
