The ptp are based on AP hw, so diff atheros cpu and gigabit port
Gino A. Villarini President Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. www.aeronetpr.com @aeronetpr From: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, October 17, 2014 at 12:13 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP PTP Latency It's the same thing than the Force 100, just mechanically different... IIRC. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ________________________________ From: "Matt via Af" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 7:18:47 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP PTP Latency > Anyone heard what the new ePMP PTP will have for latency when using GPS sync? http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/pressreleases/2014/10/14/cambium-networks-unveils-epmp-force-110-ptp-at-wispapalooza http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/spec-sheets/epmp_force110_ptp_specs I dont see mention of GPS sync on the force 110. If not how is it any better then a Ubiquiti? We need frequency reuse even on backhauls.
