A POE powered fiber to POE media converter that gets its power and sync from a 
sync injector and has a weather proof enclosure 


There you go Forrest A product that you need at least 2 at every tower


—
Sent from Mailbox

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:22 PM, timothy steele via Af <[email protected]>
wrote:

> A microtik cloud router with sync injector & POE ports 
> —
> Sent from Mailbox
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) via Af
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> A 12 - 24 port switch that you can sync whatever or POE whatever, software 
>> configurable.
>> I would expect it to be expensive…
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul McCall via Af
>> Sent: Tuesday, 7 October 2014 1:09 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas
>>  
>> Even a 12+4 would be great
>>  
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of timothy steele via Af
>> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 9:36 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas
>>  
>> A sync injecter with 28 ports 24 sync injected ports + 4 POE ports for BH's 
>> that would keep things much cleaner at tower sites
>> —
>> Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox>  
>>  
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Mathew Howard via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
>>      +1 to that. 
>>      
>> ________________________________
>>      From: Af [[email protected]] on behalf of Josh Reynolds via Af 
>> [[email protected]]
>>      Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 7:59 PM
>>      To: [email protected]
>>      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas
>>      You know what I really need more than anything else?
>>      
>>      I need a DC-terminal POE pass-through for 8-16 devices, where I can 
>> toggle between UBNT 24v passive poe, 48-56v, and maybe 56V 1A per-port. 
>> Maybe two models, an "8 device" and a "16 device" model (16/32 ports).
>>      
>>      Also will want a rack-mount version with 24 devices (48 ports), so make 
>> that maybe 3 models.
>>      
>>      This way I can use whatever switch I want, yet still have full control 
>> over each device. It should be able to send syslog messages/traps, and 
>> that's pretty much it.
>>      Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
>>      SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com
>>      On 10/05/2014 12:19 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af wrote:
>>              It's been (quite) a while since I sent one of these messages 
>> out to the list. 
>>               
>>              With the release of all of our new gigabit injectors, it is 
>> time for me to decide which products will be next out the door at PacketFlux.
>>               
>>              We've got several products at various stages of completion, but 
>> almost all of them I expect to be very low volume projects - the type of 
>> products we complete just because they help fill out our product offering 
>> instead of expecting a lot of revenue from them.   A couple of these have 
>> appeared on the website recently - I.E. a 2 Relay, 3 Switch module, and the 
>> voltmeter/shunt input modules.
>>               
>>              So, what I'd love to hear is some suggestions for products 
>> PacketFlux could build which would help you in your WISP.   I'm particularly 
>> looking for products which if they existed would go at every one of your 
>> tower sites, or even better at every customer location.  I know these 
>> product ideas exist out there, and I'd love to hear them.   Feel free to 
>> throw ideas out which are outside of the narrow niche that you think of 
>> PacketFlux fitting into.
>>               
>>              One final note  - there is always a query for an all-in-one 
>> tower device which includes some mixture of ac power supply, dc-dc 
>> conversion, battery charging/management, Ethernet switch, router, power 
>> injection, fiber conversion, etc..   I've heard those loud and clear and am 
>> aware of that desire.   There's work being done in-house toward something 
>> like that, but there are many hurdles left to make it a reality.  If there's 
>> a simplified version of this which would fit a specific, widespread, need 
>> I'd love to hear about it, but the idea of a device you put into your rack 
>> and it handles everything needed at a tower site is still quite a ways off 
>> for us.
>>               
>>              So, throw your best ideas out there... I'd love to take a 
>> couple and run with them.
>>               
>>              -forrest
>>               
>>               
>>               
>>               
>>       
>>  

Reply via email to