+1. I would also like to see a more "refined" and usable web interface for the SiteMonitor line of products.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Adam Moffett via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > > Or 12 port? Anything more than 4. > > Rack mount 24 port sync over power injector. Possibly with surge >> protection. >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) via >> Af <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It's been (quite) a while since I sent one of these messages out to the >>> list. >>> >>> With the release of all of our new gigabit injectors, it is time for me >>> to >>> decide which products will be next out the door at PacketFlux. >>> >>> We've got several products at various stages of completion, but almost >>> all >>> of them I expect to be very low volume projects - the type of products we >>> complete just because they help fill out our product offering instead of >>> expecting a lot of revenue from them. A couple of these have appeared >>> on >>> the website recently - I.E. a 2 Relay, 3 Switch module, and the >>> voltmeter/shunt input modules. >>> >>> So, what I'd love to hear is some suggestions for products PacketFlux >>> could >>> build which would help you in your WISP. I'm particularly looking for >>> products which if they existed would go at every one of your tower >>> sites, or >>> even better at every customer location. I know these product ideas exist >>> out there, and I'd love to hear them. Feel free to throw ideas out >>> which >>> are outside of the narrow niche that you think of PacketFlux fitting >>> into. >>> >>> One final note - there is always a query for an all-in-one tower device >>> which includes some mixture of ac power supply, dc-dc conversion, battery >>> charging/management, Ethernet switch, router, power injection, fiber >>> conversion, etc.. I've heard those loud and clear and am aware of that >>> desire. There's work being done in-house toward something like that, >>> but >>> there are many hurdles left to make it a reality. If there's a >>> simplified >>> version of this which would fit a specific, widespread, need I'd love to >>> hear about it, but the idea of a device you put into your rack and it >>> handles everything needed at a tower site is still quite a ways off for >>> us. >>> >>> So, throw your best ideas out there... I'd love to take a couple and run >>> with them. >>> >>> -forrest >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >
