matt i'd suggest looking at the SAF integra.  You could almost buy 2 links
for the prices you quoted from the other brands ;-)



On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Matt Jenkins via Af <[email protected]> wrote:

> All will do 1gbps. I think these are listed in order of price. I am using
> Exalt now. Looking heavily at the PTP820c for QoS and OAM features.
>
> Cambium PTP820c with 80mhz channels, 1024QAM(~$23k)
> Exalt ExtremeAir with XPIC and 80mhz channel, 256QAM (~$25k)
> Ceragon IP20c, 60mhz channels, 2048QAM (I think this is about $35k?)
>
> Matthew Jenkins
> SmarterBroadband
> [email protected]
> 530.272.4000
>
> On 10/28/2014 10:41 PM, TJ Trout via Af wrote:
>
>> What's the top 3 fastest single radio's available right now? I'm assuming
>> it will be 80mhz and 2048qam+?
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Bill Prince via Af <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Or thereabouts.  Our newest link was engineered for -43.  No smoke.
>>
>>     bp
>>
>>     On 10/28/2014 4:37 PM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote:
>>
>>>     What do ya engineer it for? Most of the licensed stuff I've dealt
>>>     with has been engineered to be hotter than -40.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     -----
>>>     Mike Hammett
>>>     Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>     http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>>     <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+
>>> IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.
>>> com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>
>>>     ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ------------
>>>     *From: *"Eric Kuhnke via Af" <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>     *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>     *Sent: *Tuesday, October 28, 2014 5:22:08 PM
>>>     *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Cheapest Full duplex / Full Gig licensed
>>>     radio currently
>>>
>>>     yeah, 2048QAM, but what is your fade margin from the threshold
>>>     required to run at 2048QAM vs. when it will step down to 256QAM
>>>     and no longer be a 1 Gbps radio?
>>>
>>>     If I recall right an IP20C requires an RSSI of something like
>>>     -57.5 to operate at 2048QAM and will become a 256QAM radio at -63
>>>     or thereabouts. Not much fade margin. Not something you can
>>>     reliably predict as a five nines true 1Gbps link pretending to be
>>>     a fiber patch cable between two routers.
>>>
>>>     Unless you're running it at sub-4km distances with 60cm size
>>>     antennas and the normal RSL is -35.0....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Caleb Knauer via Af
>>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         We just put up a Ceragon IP20c link last week, 3.5 miles, one
>>>         60Mhz
>>>         frequency pair, 1030Mbps full duplex using 2048QAM, uses two
>>>         cores
>>>         (same frequency) in a single FODU chasis and a combiner on the
>>>         antenna.  Looks like any other single FODU install, very
>>>         clean.  Not
>>>         inexpensive however.
>>>
>>>         On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Matt Jenkins via Af
>>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>         > Cambium PTP820c
>>>         > Exalt ExtremeAir
>>>         >
>>>         > Both will give you 1gig in a single radio.
>>>         >
>>>         > Matthew Jenkins
>>>         > SmarterBroadband
>>>         > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>         > 530.272.4000 <tel:530.272.4000>
>>>         >
>>>         > On 10/27/2014 03:25 PM, Peter Kranz via Af wrote:
>>>         >>
>>>         >>
>>>         >> Has anyone shopped full Gig licensed links lately, which
>>>         is the best
>>>         >> bargain?
>>>         >>
>>>         >> *Peter Kranz
>>>         >> *Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
>>>         >> www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.UnwiredLtd.com>
>>>         <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
>>>         >> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 <tel:510-868-1614%20x100>
>>>         >> Mobile: 510-207-0000 <tel:510-207-0000>
>>>         >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>         <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>         >>
>>>         >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to