+1
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "timothy steele via Af" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 5:35:31 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Punch down We need fiber on AP not a punch down — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Bill Prince via Af < [email protected] > wrote: Punch downs are only good for a relatively limited number of cycles (way less than an RJ45). So punch downs are good when you expect the connection to be good for the duration (like usually years). If you expect to make/break the connection a few times, you would not use a punch down. bp On 10/30/2014 2:26 PM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote: <blockquote> Wear and tear? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Reynolds via Af" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 4:18:55 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Punch down F that. Wear and tear on CPEs . We don't use them, but many swear they will only let their installers use EZ-RJ45. If that 's the case, I wouldn't want those people punching down radios. Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 10/30/2014 01:11 PM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote: <blockquote> What do you guys think of punching down on radios, PoE, etc.? I saw a radio at WISPAPALOOZA that had you punch down the wires onto the radio's circuit board. Seems like it would cut down on any issues of the RJ45 coming undone. What pitfalls would there be? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com </blockquote> </blockquote>
