You wouldn't, since it would cease to run :-) On Sunday, November 2, 2014, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why would you pull half of the spark plugs on a Ferrari? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Eric Kuhnke via Af" <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > *To: *[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Sent: *Wednesday, September 24, 2014 9:03:18 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance > > I wonder how the performance of the Mimosa 256QAM product will compare in > a 20 MHz wide, TDD channel when used with the same antennas, head-to-head > against the Mikrotik board. In a scenario not using any of the special > frequency auto selecting features of the Mimosa/Quantenna chipset. > > I have in mind a setup with a pair of the Jirous 32dB high performance > type antennas with a metal enclosure on the rear. > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Stefan Englhardt via Af <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> The Sextant did not work for us at all. The QRT-5 has a quite good >> Antenna for it’s size. >> >> But you cant upgrade/repair them as they use special screws you cant open >> without damaging >> >> them. >> >> >> >> The Mars-Antennas have a metal housing so there is some shielding to the >> back. We don’t like >> >> the outdoor-pigtails/connectors as with the rocket / ePMP-Force / ePMP >> Sectors. Just one >> >> Ethernet leaving the housing to the bottom is the solution we see the >> least problems. >> >> >> >> >> >> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-bounces+ste >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-bounces%2Bste');>[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] *Im Auftrag von *Mike >> Hammett via Af >> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 24. September 2014 15:40 >> *An:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance >> >> >> >> I remember when they announced their new "high gain CPE" the Sextant... >> which was still smaller than the smallest CPE I used. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Glen Waldrop via Af" <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> *To: *[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> *Sent: *Wednesday, September 24, 2014 8:37:54 AM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance >> >> >> >> I can't get over the small gain MT uses. >> >> It also bugs me that the FCC seems to be all about massive amps and small >> antennas rather than the reverse. >> >> If it was actually about interference PTP shots with narrow beamwidth is >> preferred. I suppose it is too much to ask for those in our government that >> set the regulations to actually understand the tech they're regulating. >> >> I suppose it could be the manufacturers are going with big amps and small >> antennas, but it seems that would cost more. >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> *From:* Mike Hammett via Af >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> >> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 24, 2014 8:33 AM >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance >> >> >> >> The SXT antenna were always too weak. Give me 25 dBi or give me death. >> Well, okay, I don't feel that strongly. I just won't buy it if not. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Stefan Englhardt via Af" <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> *To: *[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> *Sent: *Wednesday, September 24, 2014 8:30:07 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance >> >> We’re starting the move to .ac with MT now. The 922UAGS-5HPacD has the >> same dimensions as >> >> the 911/411 Boards so we just replace boards. >> >> >> >> We get good results with Mars Antennas with housing for P2P. The >> SXT-Antennas are to weak for .ac. >> >> The 19db Mars Antennas give good CPE/short range PTP with a small >> footprint. We use these as >> >> Sector-Antennas where we have to cover small areas. >> >> >> >> The .ac firmware adaption is quite new but we see stable results in the >> 300-400 Mbit/s range for short links. >> >> The .ac boards have faster CPUs so they may increase 11n-Speeds/NAT >> Performance. >> >> The 922-Board has a SFP. Ethernetport has moved. Due to this the >> RFElements Stationbox XL do not fit. >> >> >> >> MT .ac does PTP and PTMP and is downward compatible to older boards with >> 11n/a. >> >> >> >> SXTs with .ac are not stable with the latest sw-release. So as always >> with MT you’ve to betatest >> >> HW/FW-combination to get it running smooth. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-bounces%2bste%[email protected]');>] >> *Im Auftrag von *Rory Conaway via Af >> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 24. September 2014 14:26 >> *An:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance >> >> >> >> Yeeeeaaaaa, I don’t’ think so. If you use Ubiquiti you pretty much know >> what works and what doesn’t. in reality, you use as few custom features >> as possible outside 802.11 compatibility and limit the radios to Layer 2 >> bridges or nothing more than NAT whenever possible. Try not to use any of >> the customer features although AirMax seems to be working pretty well. >> You just don’t want to add anything that adds to processor overhead on an >> AP for Rocket M5’s if you have a higher density. When the Titanium’s >> tanked a couple years ago, there was a huge hole in any kind of AP product >> with the ability to handle density due to the processor but nobody filled >> it. It still hasn’t been filled to my satisfaction meaning we aren’t >> replacing Rocket 5M’s any time soon and we are keeping them at 50 users or >> less for another few months. However, NetFlix and video streaming means we >> are pushing that down to a planned 30 over the next couple of months. That >> numbers are just estimates but somewhere between 30-50 under heavy video >> streaming usage and AirMax will start causing issues. >> >> >> >> If you allow torrents or anything that opens up a massive number of >> connections, then the number of users per AP drops significantly which is >> why we run filtering on the back end to reduce that. I’ve seen APs with >> less than 30 go apoplectic with a couple of wild torrent users. >> >> >> >> Rory >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-bounces%2brory%[email protected]');>] >> *On Behalf Of *That One Guy via Af >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:47 PM >> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance >> >> >> >> :-) the ubntboys tend to not be all that informed they blindly swear by >> whatever the spec sheets and feature notices tell them >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Josh Reynolds via Af <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >> For the first question, I have no idea, since the only released radios >> are PtP at this time. Pretty hard to tell. >> >> For the second one, "ubntboys" (at least the informed ones) don't run >> airsync, because they know it doesn't work well. :) >> >> Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer >> SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com >> >> On 09/23/2014 09:06 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: >> >> does it work? or does it work in ubntboys eyes like airsync? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >> For clarification for EVERYBODY reading this post, ALL AIRMAX AC >> PRODUCTS HAVE AIRMAX OFFLOADING :) >> >> Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer >> SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com >> >> On 09/23/2014 07:33 PM, Mathew Howard via Af wrote: >> >> The ptp-lites do have airmax offloading? I thought they didn't... >> >> We've had a link running for awhile, but it's got some noise issues, so >> it hasn't really been the best place to test these... that said, they've >> been running fine without any real problems that I've noticed. >> � >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Af [[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-bounces%2bmathew%[email protected]');>] >> on behalf of Josh Reynolds via Af [[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:49 PM >> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance >> >> ptp lites are missing the internal shielding (i think?) as well as >> airprism tech >> >> they do have airmax offloading, but it's also a brand new product line... >> some bugs are showing in the software >> >> Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer >> SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com >> >> On 09/23/2014 06:48 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: >> >> These are basically beta release hardware? its missing some guts? >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Rory Conaway via Af <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >> I don�t have one but from what I�m reading, it�s not quite ready >> for primetime.� I�m waiting. >> >> � >> >> Rory >> >> � >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-bounces+rory >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-bounces%2Brory');>= >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] *On >> Behalf Of *TJ Trout via Af >> *Sent:* Monday, September 22, 2014 6:39 PM >> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance >> >> � >> >> How are the rocket AC's performing for you guys? Throughput? Bugs? >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the >> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the >> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the >> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >> >> >> >> >> > > >
