Your cable and DSL is a lot slower and more expensive than it is here. The physics are easier to accomplish when you don't have to move as many bits through the air.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Reynolds via Af" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 3:13:19 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Sync on UBNT Titanium That's fine. We'll go back to running the same wisp that is taking both the cable co and clec's in-town customers and has been for the past 10 years... without sync. On 11/21/2014 06:39 PM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote: Those are very compelling, but not enough bits without bigger channels, which then need sync. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Reynolds via Af" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 7:19:14 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Sync on UBNT Titanium Or you can swap it out with -AC and get 65Mbps on a 10MHz channel, realtime airview, and much better selectivity :P On 11/21/2014 03:10 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: <blockquote> you can swap it all out with epmp On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> It may work, but it will tank you r throughput. On 11/21/2014 01:32 PM, Jerry Richardson via Af wrote: <blockquote> Has anyone successfully implemented? � Jerry -- josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com </blockquote> -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 </blockquote> -- josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com </blockquote> -- josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
