Only way to get sync to work on UBNT gear that I have found is the stuff bitlomat is working on
— Sent from Mailbox On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Chuck Hogg via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > We had an implementation of UBNT sync that was less than favorable. 3 > links in the same 90 degree plane...it helped slightly, reduced total > throughput, channel management still had to be done, and true Cambium-style > sync was never achieved. It never worked in 2.4GHz IMO. > Regards, > Chuck > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Caleb Knauer via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >> If you two kids don't stop fighting I swear to god I'm pulling over this >> car and slapping you with my ring hand. >> >> >> On Saturday, November 22, 2014, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Your cable and DSL is a lot slower and more expensive than it is here. >>> The physics are easier to accomplish when you don't have to move as many >>> bits through the air. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Josh Reynolds via Af" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Saturday, November 22, 2014 3:13:19 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Sync on UBNT Titanium >>> >>> That's fine. >>> >>> We'll go back to running the same wisp that is taking both the cable co >>> and clec's in-town customers and has been for the past 10 years... without >>> sync. >>> >>> On 11/21/2014 06:39 PM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote: >>> >>> Those are very compelling, but not enough bits without bigger channels, >>> which then need sync. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Josh Reynolds via Af" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Friday, November 21, 2014 7:19:14 PM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Sync on UBNT Titanium >>> >>> Or you can swap it out with -AC and get 65Mbps on a 10MHz channel, >>> realtime airview, and much better selectivity :P >>> >>> On 11/21/2014 03:10 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: >>> >>> you can swap it all out with epmp >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It may work, but it will tank your throughput. >>>> >>>> On 11/21/2014 01:32 PM, Jerry Richardson via Af wrote: >>>> >>>> Has anyone successfully implemented? >>>> >>>> � >>>> >>>> Jerry >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> josh reynolds :: chief information officer >>>> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that >>> the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>> >>> >>> -- >>> josh reynolds :: chief information officer >>> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> josh reynolds :: chief information officer >>> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com >>> >>> >>>
