Mark, we are on the same page! Take a look at Telco Systems.  All
features, good pricing



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com  
@aeronetpr






On 12/1/14, 9:52 AM, "Mark Radabaugh via Af" <[email protected]> wrote:

>We are evaluating vendors for this at the moment.  Ciena is looking like
>the winner at the moment, with G.8032 as the loop control topology.
>
>So far we have rejected Cisco, Juniper, Performant, Accedian, and Extreme
>as vendors.
>
>To answer Forrest¹s question - yes, we do need faster recovery than we
>can get from MSTP, OSPF, MPLS.   While those protocols have worked well,
>they don¹t have the recovery time we want.
>
>Other things we are looking for beyond quick recovery time:
>
>Carrier Ethernet Services (Metro Ethernet Forum)
>Ethernet OAM
>Performance Monitoring (Y.1731)
>
>I want to be able to offer carrier type services (NNI, E-Line, E-LAN,
>E-Tree, E-Access) to other companies over our wireless and fiber network.
> If you want to sell services to cell companies they are requiring Y.1731
>(Performance Monitoring) at the handoff.
>
>We already have pieces of this in place over the wireless network using
>Q-in-Q, but want to extend this further.  We currently have one other ISP
>set up selling services over our wireless network with transparent (to
>the customer) Ethernet delivery back to the providers network.   It¹s
>pretty cool in that they can install customers anywhere on our Canopy
>network and deliver the Ethernet traffic back to their network.  We don¹t
>care what VLAN, IP Addressing, DHCP, or Authentication scheme they are
>using - it¹s just Ethernet.
>
>Mark
>
>
>
>
>> On Dec 1, 2014, at 1:11 AM, Scott Vander Dussen via Af <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>> 
>> Looking to add Ethernet ring protection switching into our network.
>>I've attached a PDF demonstrating the topology of the test tower set.
>>I'm leaning toward a G.8032v2 implementation simply because it's ITU
>>standards based and not vendor specific.  Other options include Brocade
>>MRP, Moxa Turbo Chain, etc.  Any shared wisdom would be greatly
>>appreciate before we get ourselves pot committed.
>> 
>> Scott
>> 
>

Reply via email to