Did u make sure they linked up in lab first?

Jaime Solorza
On Dec 12, 2014 7:08 PM, "That One Guy via Af" <[email protected]> wrote:

> the ground is frozen, pretty much all tilled farmland. Is it possible im
> seeing some sort of multipath type madness that this thing just wouldnt not
> link up. Ive had a harder time pointing shorter 5ghz links
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Jaime Solorza via Af <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Slow and easy...slow and easy...
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>> On Dec 12, 2014 11:43 AM, "That One Guy via Af" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> madness we are a little better than the target after fine alignment. at
>>> one point we had the 4' side pinting to the ground abot 100 yards out ant
>>> it still had about a -80 on the bnc readout
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Ken Hohhof via Af <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>   Yeah, it was so considerate of AT&T to leave that dish up there when
>>>> they sold off the site, only needed to be re-aimed about 2 degrees to go
>>>> where we wanted.  And they built a platform to stand on while aiming it,
>>>> that was awfully nice of them.  And they left the flexible waveguide down
>>>> to the shelter.  I’d really hate to think about hanging a new 12 ft dish
>>>> ourselves and running waveguide to it.  And it’s an Andrew parabolic, not
>>>> the old WE horns, so we don’t have to worry about water getting into the
>>>> waveguide and freezing.  It doesn’t even look like anyone has been using
>>>> the lightning bolt logo for target practice.  Life is good when someone
>>>> abandons nice stuff you can use.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  *From:* Hardy, Tim via Af <[email protected]>
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, December 12, 2014 11:18 AM
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] aligning bigger antennas on short paths
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> HPBW for a 12 ft dish at 11.2 GHz is 0.5 degree.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof via
>>>> Af
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, December 12, 2014 11:17 AM
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] aligning bigger antennas on short paths
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nope, a 4 ft dish in 11 GHz should be pretty narrow, a few degrees and
>>>> you should be into a deep, deep null.  Take a look at the beamwidth or
>>>> pattern for your antenna.  It should be similar to an 8 ft dish in 5.x GHz.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We once used an existing 12 ft dish for an 11 GHz link and I kept
>>>> having to tell the tower guy he was not going to be able to eyeball it.
>>>> The beamwidth was something like 1 degree if I remember right.  He ketp
>>>> getting nada for signal until I made him slowly sweep the azimuth.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* That One Guy via Af <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, December 12, 2014 9:50 AM
>>>>
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] aligning bigger antennas on short paths
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Weve never gone above 2'
>>>>
>>>> we finished installing our 11ghz link yesterday and had the antennas
>>>> rough aligned, one side is 3' one side is 4'. I expected the tighter
>>>> patterns would make it harder to find the initial link but they actually
>>>> linked up right off the bat and it was right on the projected power levels.
>>>>
>>>> This is only 10 miles, so we have visual on the path.
>>>>
>>>> We did a  little rough alignment yesterday, and will do the fine
>>>> alignment today. when we we roughing it there was a good amount of travel
>>>> on the antenna (4') side we were on and only a couple db change. do larger
>>>> antennas on such a short path give you a little more leniency in alignment
>>>> or something? we will do full horizontal and vertical panning today to make
>>>> sure we arent in side lobes, just curious is there is more slop in this
>>>> scenario.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
>>>> the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
>>>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
>>>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
>>> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
>>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
>>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
>>>
>>
>
> --
> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
>

Reply via email to