Here is an excerpt from a posting on the Cambium community forum from one of 
our system engineers.  The posting has screenshots and examples of a 
troubleshooting scenario with VE.

http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PTP-Getting-Started/What-does-Vector-Error-VE-mean-and-what-are-the-practical/m-p/37425#U37425

Vector Error (VE) provides a useful indication of the quality of the received 
signal. VE is the normalised error between the received QAM signal and a set of 
ideal QAM constellation points. VE has units of dB. A more negative number 
(e.g. -30 dB) indicates a better signal than a more positive number (e.g. -10 
dB). VE is rarely a positive number, which represents a very poor signal.

Sources of VE are thermal noise, distortion, interference, and oscillator phase 
noise. With a low receive power, VE indicates the approximate signal to noise 
of the receive signal. At higher receive power, VE can be degraded by overload 
of the transmitter at the remote end of the link or overload of the receiver at 
the local end of the link. Oscillator phase noise and the noise floor of the 
receiver set a lower limit on the VE that can be measured, at about -33 dB.

Regards,

Bruce

Product Manager
Cambium Networks


From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Vander Dussen via Af
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 5:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP500 does 2mb/s

David/Ken-
Thanks for the quick and helpful replies.  From the manual:

Vector Error
The vector error measurement compares the received signal's In phase / 
Quadrature (IQ)
modulation characteristics to an ideal signal to determine the composite error 
vector
magnitude. The results are stored in an histogram and expressed in dB and 
presented as:
max, mean, min and latest. The max, min and latest are true instantaneous 
measurements;
the mean is the mean of a set of one second means. The expected range for 
Vector Error
would be approximately -1.5 dB (NLOS link operating at sensitivity limit on 
BPSK 0.50) to -28
dB (short LOS link running 64 QAM 0.83). See Section 7.3.1 "Histogram Data".

I interpret this paragraph that -28db is more desirable than -1.5db.  Is that 
correct?  If my min values are circa -28db and that's bad, what would be an 
expected good value?

I don't think it's a noise issue, I set the interference threshold to -63.  
Here's each side's SA.  Remote side on bottom.  I'd favor the pigtail has water 
intrusion.

Thanks again,
Scott


From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David via Af
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 14:43
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP500 does 2mb/s

Scott,
�Have a look at the slave side spectrum manager and see if there is some 
noise cropping up.
If not then you may have some water in a pigtail or defective. Also, may want 
to do a site walk to see if the antennas may have moved due to weather or 
something in the path since it was installed.
�More often then not the tale tale signature if a bad pig tail is the vector 
error is all over the place.
These things usually dont have grey area when it comes to detailed 
informational tags like "Limited by WIRELESS conditions"
Start with spectrum manager and see what it says then look at Diag plotter for 
unusual patterns in vector corrections.
On 12/12/2014 03:54 PM, Scott Vander Dussen via Af wrote:
I�m diagnosing a slow throughput PTP500 link remotely.� This link�s 
real-world capacity is only about 2mb/s.� Attached is screenshots of the 
status page.� Anything stick out as weird or wrong?� It was on 15mb/s 
channels, I tried 10mb/s � there�s plenty of clean spectrum.� It�s not 
making sense to me that this is only able to move 2mb/s.
�
Thanks,
Scott
�
�

Reply via email to