no, its got to do with prepping to move an entirely bridged network to routed, then having the funding for the routers cut out from under you, sore subject, but it is what it is and it works.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > Kim poops!!! It's true!!! > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I just watched an old PBS Frontline about No. Korea last night. >> “The Interview” must have gotten all their info from that episode. >> Including the bit about Kim Jong Un not pooping. Cracked me up. >> >> *From:* Mike Hammett <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Monday, January 05, 2015 2:20 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits >> >> Honeypots? >> >> Or if you saw The Interview... Honeydicks are also a thing. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Bill Prince" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Monday, January 5, 2015 3:19:24 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits >> >> I can not imagine what circumstance would require something like that. >> >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:09 AM, That One Guy <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> lol, no the fortigate limit of 25. I have 94 to put on an interface >>> right now >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> More than 255 addresses on ONE interface? >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:59 PM, That One Guy <[email protected] >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> This is a transition on this particular project, moving all the IPs >>>>> from a powercode BMU to an intermediary router, but some of our sites >>>>> could >>>>> easily exceed this number. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 255 until 2.2 kernel which is like a bazillion. I'm sure MT is using >>>>>> a later version of the kernel. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've never done 20, but I also don't know what it would be. Usually >>>>>>> when we are doing more than a couple, it is a transition kind of thing >>>>>>> while we are preparing a new link or something. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:23 AM, That One Guy < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We recently found that our Fortigates have a limit to the number of >>>>>>>> IPs you can assign to a single interface, pretty low at 20 something. >>>>>>>> We >>>>>>>> havent found a limit in the Imagestreams. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there a limit on Mikrotik? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember >>>>>>>> that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. >>>>>>>> Therefore, if >>>>>>>> you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all >>>>>>>> means, do >>>>>>>> not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> bp >>>>>>> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that >>>>> the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >>>>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do >>>>> not >>>>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that >>> the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> bp >> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com >> >> > > -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
