Wait, you had a piece of technology that was working just fine.. and you
messed with it?! Of course that introduced a problem!! LOL I haven't seen
that myself.


-Ty

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I don't know if this is a bug or not...  Our new Unifi AP has been running
> about 24 hours without a hitch.  I started up the controller on my desktop,
> and my partners laptop lost connection to WiFi.  I had not pushed any
> buttons, merely "started" the Unifi controller app.
>
> Is this a known issue?
>
> Not nice.
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
> On 1/20/2015 11:54 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
>> It runs like shit on windows. It's using Linux emulation libraries.
>>
>> On January 20, 2015 10:48:12 AM AKST, Bill Prince <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The machine I first loaded it on is running Windows 8.1 (puke BTW), but
>>>
>>> I didn't have a lot of choices.  When Unifi didn't work, I googled
>>> around and found out I needed to roll back java to 7.x.
>>>
>>> But it's a pretty snappy machine; 3.7 GHz quad-core A10 with plenty of
>>> memory.
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>> On 1/20/2015 11:40 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>>
>>>> Depends on the hardware it's on, and the hardware you're using to
>>>>
>>> manage it.
>>>
>>>> On January 20, 2015 10:18:31 AM AKST, Bill Prince
>>>>
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> With all the talk, we got some of these.  Put one up in our office
>>>>>
>>>> this
>>>
>>>> morning.  It seems to work OK.
>>>>>
>>>>> Controller takes a century to load initially.
>>>>>
>>>>> I had to time-travel back from 2115 to write this.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> bp
>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/13/2015 2:08 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/13/15 13:49, Daniel White wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a Unifi AC AP at my house.  Have not been overly impressed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have two at the office. They don't do much more than basic office
>>>>>> wireless stuff though and seem to be fine so far. What have you
>>>>>>
>>>>> found
>>>
>>>> lacking?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~Seth
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>

Reply via email to