I don't think it's a Nanostation form factor... it says "world-breaking range", range would be pretty limited with something like that. Then again, I'm not sure how much range you need to break the world, but it sounds like a bad idea anyway.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Eric Muehleisen <[email protected]> wrote: > If the picture in the email ad is any indication, it looks more like a > nanostation form factor. Wouldn't that limit it's antenna size back down > into sub 5ghz land? > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> If not Streakwave, I would bet that you could find someone else that >> would be willing to sell them to a HAM... worst case, you could probably >> buy one from a reseller in another country. >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Wonder if streakwave would even sell it to a ham operator if they show >>> them the HAMlicense? Might be worth experimenting with the band anyways... >>> So we would know if its worth pushing regulatory changes over. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> Kurt Fankhauser >>> Wavelinc Communications >>> P.O. Box 126 >>> Bucyrus, OH 44820 >>> http://www.wavelinc.com >>> tel. 419-562-6405 >>> fax. 419-617-0110 >>> >>> > On Feb 2, 2015, at 2:08 PM, Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> On 2/2/15 12:04, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: >>> >> Can a Ham radio operator use 10ghz today? >>> > >>> > >>> > Yep, for noncommercial use. >>> > >>> > ~Seth >>> >> >> >
