any good whitespace options that don't cost a million $$ yet? Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 4, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > > Its just waiting until late next year is terrible. We actually have lost a > couple to satellite that could only get 900Mhz now. Every 900 mhz customer > we have is vulnerable. > > Cambium. PLEASE move up the timeline ! > > J > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 1:10 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450.... > > In fairness, some WISPs have consistently said they are deep in trees and 900 > MHz spectrum is clean for them and also their customer base doesn’t need to > stream 4K, they just want more throughput than 900 FSK will give them. Via > wider channels, higher modulation, or magic. > > I know many of us can’t make the same statements about noise floor or > customer expectations, but some people consistently say they want such a > product. And who knows, maybe there’s some magic, too? Like maybe more > robustness to multipath, which seems to bother 900 FSK quite a bit. > > From: Andy Trimmell > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 11:47 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450.... > > 40Mbps by late 2016 should be just in time so we can hook up 1 customer to it > because 4K TV will be streaming 50Mbps on Netflix > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 12:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450.... > > Perhaps as much as 40 Mbps.... > > Dontcha wish you were at Animal Farm.... > > From: Chuck McCown > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:11 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450.... > > 3x throughput increase > > From: Chuck McCown > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:11 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450.... > > 40 MHz channels >
