whether you agree or not, it is not a mockery of the law..it is a lawful process in our current rule of government. It is easy to want to state you want "laissez faire" but image what would happen if government didn't offer us some protection. FCC ---licensed links for example. Once license process is done and you have a legitimate license, you have recourse.. Try getting help on unlicensed links.... not a political stance...just practical
Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390 On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]> wrote: > The forbearance process, changeable at any time for any politically > expedient reason, scares me. It's 'executive authority' all over again > and makes a mockery of the rule of law and the democratic process. > > Mark > > > > On Feb 5, 2015, at 5:57 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > But the only permanent part of this I see is being reclassified as a > utility. Everything else including forbearing from most of the bad stuff > is totally up to change, with very little upside and tons of downside. It > would be different if this was proposed legislation, it wouldn't be > changeable at the whim of future FCC commissioners. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- From: David > > Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 4:52 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] "Net neutrality" > > > > I hope so.. Because I can be Extreme :) > > > >> On 02/05/2015 02:46 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: > >> Steve's talk about this yesterday lead me to believe this is something > we can live with. > >> > >> -----Original Message----- From: Brett A Mansfield > >> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 11:28 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: [AFMUG] "Net neutrality" > >> > >> I just ready yet another article on the so called "net neutrality" the > FCC will be voting on Feb 26th. This government overreach is going to force > me to have to register to collect taxes on all of my customers, which I'll > need to pay someone to do for me to make sure I stay in compliance, which > will require that I raise prices to cover my increased costs. > >> > >> It will also prevent me from being able to run any kind of QoS on my > network, so goodbye to any decent VoIP calls. > >> > >> I for one would like to keep the government out of my business beyond > what they already are. The article I read stated that it will likely pass. > If it does, I think something very "extreme" may need to be done. If in > protest every ISP in the USA shut down their networks either until the law > was repealed or for just a day or two strike I think the government would > get the picture, and if they didn't then the millions of people complaining > to them about it would certainly help. > >> > >> I know that is very extreme, but just a thought. Anyone else have any > ideas? Perhaps if we just threaten to do so may help? I'm just spitballing > here, so please don't think I'm being to crazy. I just want the discussion > to begin of what we could really do to stop this. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Brett A Mansfield > > > > >
