I assume 11 GHz doesn't exist around here. ;-)
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 11:09:35 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 2 - 5 mile links In that distance range 11, 18 and 23 GHz would all be candidates. Depending on frequency coordination, antenna size constraints, and desire to use common equipment across your network. 23 GHz licensed is allowed higher EIRP than 24 GHz UL and will go farther, so at 2 miles I would definitely consider it. But like someone said, run the numbers. And assume historical rain data may be optimistic, unless you are a climate change denier. We seem to have several 100 year storms per year now. From: Mike Hammett Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 11:03 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 2 - 5 mile links Indeed. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 10:58:22 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 2 - 5 mile links Near Chicago? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: Are we looking at 18 GHz for good uptime and high data rates at that distance? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
