If I may put on my jerk hat for a second, what makes you think 5Ghz is WISP spectrum? It's not, just like 900/2.4Ghz isn't. You can't own unlicensed frequency, and as long as the gear is following P15 rules then there's pretty much nothing that you can do. 900Mhz died that way, and who knows what the future holds for 5Ghz. The only block you could consider "WISP spectrum" is 3.65, and with so many using the band that don't play by the rules with regards to registration etc I think maybe the feds are going to have a hard time allocating more this way.
Also, go ahead and point your stuff at big red/blue, and while you may be within your legal rights it won't be a fun fight. Actually if they are just one way 5Ghz for downstream then it won't do anything to them anyway. Or maybe I'm just tired and cranky. On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Tim Reichhart <[email protected]> wrote: > That means can we point our 5ghz backhaul stuff at there towers and make > there signal about worthless? If so that would teach cell phone companies > not to mess with WISP’s spectrum. > > > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz > Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 12:03 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz.. > > > > If systems like this end up rolling out on cell sites across the nation we > are going to see some tough times getting clear channels. I’ve seen several > proposals now for tower based systems that use very large swaths of 5Ghz as > alternative LTE data paths to cell phones with multi-channel BW designed to > suck up every free piece of 5Ghz spectrum found. > > > > http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/02/t-mobile-alcatel-wifi-and-4g-fight/ > > > > Peter Kranz > Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd > www.UnwiredLtd.com > Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 > Mobile: 510-207-0000 > [email protected] > >
