this being listed in km, i am assuming this is not US/FCC power levels?
what are the power regulations in that particular locale?

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Patrick Leary <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Just came in. Interesting. Of course, this is with one BTS doing split
> sectors. With 2 BTS, you could do 360 in this model.
>
> Patrick Leary
>  M 727.501.3735
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Terry Duchcherer
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 1:23 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Telrad] RF Planning meat
>
> We are located on the bald prairie, low density deployments. We do not
> necessarily need NLOS, but we do need distance and throughput.
>
> We are currently testing this equipment, with 2x2 operation.
>
> LOS 20km with the CPE7000, achieved 65Mbps. Hope to go 25km with external
> antennas.
> Near LOS to a community about 5 miles from our tower, able to achieve -98
> to -104 RSRP and CINR of 15 to 22, over 60Mbps on all CPE
>
> So while 4x4 will give you the benefits for your deployment, 2x2 is giving
> us what we want.
>
> Terry
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Scott Lambert
> Sent: March-05-15 11:17 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Telrad] RF Planning meat
>
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:24:17PM +0000, Terry Duchcherer wrote:
> > Well, the current system can do two channels 2x2, so with two compacts
> > it is possible to do 360 coverage with 4 sectors.
> >
> > If there was a system capable of three channels 2x2, we could get away
> > with a single unit.
> >
> > On the wish list of all us WISP's that serve low density areas.
>
> But, 2x2 doesn't get the multipath NLoS penetration that is a big part of
> what makes Telrad's gear interesting.
>
> As I understand it, if you are going 2x2, you are missing out on half the
> benefits and bringing along all of the extra costs associated with the LTE
> core.  It might be a cheap way in, but I wouldn't expect to see "Grail"
> performance.
>
> Disclaimer: we don't have any in the air yet.
>
>
> --
> Scott Lambert                    KC5MLE                       Unix SysAdmin
> [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> Telrad mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
> _______________________________________________
> Telrad mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp
> Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
> viruses.
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
>
>
>


-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to