Good to know.
I have seen the test on the 709SC and it passed. In an Ethernet training class for a previous employer he bent the cable (not broken, just kinked), and the tester detected an error and told the distance to the kink. It was a very expensive tester. The next time I saw a tester like that we were doing a service call on a church and their IT contractor was there with one. We had him test and it passed with no errors detected.

Use what you want, but I'd never use scotchlock connectors on Ethernet.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:43 PM, TJ Trout <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I call bs that the 709sc will preform any better than a scotchlock
    connector. Att uses scotchlocks on uverse vdsl all day long. If uy
    doesn't pass a gig test there is no way a 709sc will. Have you
    actually done said test ?

    On Mar 5, 2015 8:14 PM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        End-to-end splices like the ones that I mentioned will pas a
gig test without showing impedance loss or cable errors. Phone style Y clips will not pass a gig test. Cat-5 should
        never be bent at more than a 4" radius.  You surely don't want
        a 180 degree bend in a splice.  The 709SC are your best bet
        for waterproof coupling.  Those giant inline couplers with
        threaded glands on each side cost a fortune and are overkill.

        On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:52 PM, TJ Trout <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            UY's work fine. Use them a bunch.

            Has ANYONE found a inline waterproof catX coupler for like
            $5 or less???

            On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Jeremy
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
            wrote:

Those won't pass muster with CAT5e or CAT6 specs. However, the Thomas and Betts 709SC works perfectly. You untwist less than a keystone jack for sure.

                On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Adam Moffett
                <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                    Something like one of these?


                    I always thought it would be fast.....but I always
                    assumed it wouldn't pass muster with CAT5e or CAT6
                    specs.� If you're untwisting more than 1/2" to
                    be able to physically fit the splice in, then I
                    think you're adding more crosstalk than a jack or
                    plug would.�

                    *shrug* if it's working, it's working.


                    Could be male/female, but lately I've been leaning towards 
butt spliced pairs ( times four ).

                    I think it's faster for the installes to just cut both 
cables, do a quick separation of pairs and press splice the four pairs together.

                    As opposed to punching down a female rj45 and putting a 
male rj45 end on.

                    Maybe not, still debating.

                    Not sure what the gigabit Ethernet loss/gain might be 
between these two methods either.

                    -----Original Message-----
                    From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill 
Prince
                    Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2015 3:11 PM
                    To:[email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
                    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Simple Junction Box??

                    So what's going to be in the box? RJ45-RJ45 female-female 
coupler, or what?

                    bp
                    <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

                    On 3/5/2015 10:30 AM, Sterling Jacobson wrote:
                    Mmmm, that second one might work.

                    The first one is a bit big for joining cable.

                    Still wish the second had an access hole in the back and 
were even smaller.

                    But that's better than any other option I've seen, thanks!

                    -----Original Message-----
                    From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
SmarterBroadband
                    Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2015 11:17 AM
                    To:[email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
                    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Simple Junction Box??

                    How about this?

                    
https://dthstore.com/webapp/commerce/command/ExecMacro/DescP2GY.mac/Report?O
                    LD_SHOPPER_REF=&OrderCount=0&OrderTotal=$.00

                    $2.99 if you buy 25+

                    Or

                    
https://dthstore.com/webapp/commerce/command/ExecMacro/DescB6GY.mac/Report?O
                    LD_SHOPPER_REF=&OrderCount=0&OrderTotal=$.00

                    $1.45 at 25+

                    Adam

                    -----Original Message-----
                    From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Sterling Jacobson
                    Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 10:08 AM
                    To: '[email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>'
                    Subject: [AFMUG] Simple Junction Box??

                    Still looking for a simple junction box to cover existing 
Cat5 coming out of the house.
                    This is for joining the crapping indoor rated existing Cat5 
to and outdoor rated cable.

                    Home Depot has a $3 pvc grey junction box with screw on 
cover and two � inch holes.
                    That's about the best I can find.

                    But I would still have to drill a hole out for the Cat5 
coming out of the wall.
                    And completely plug up one hole, and probably caulk up 
around the outdoor rated Cat5/6 coming out the other...

                    What I really need is that same junction box with a single 
smaller hole about the side of outdoor Cat6, and a hole in the back.

                    Nothing more.

                    Can't find anything like that.

                    And most stuff like that is over $10, for $1 worth of 
plastic.







Reply via email to