Are you creating FUD or did you actually hear that? =P

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> wrote:

> I heard FCC is intentionally stalling on the power beams as punishment to
> UBNT for all the TDWR problems.
>
>
> Kurt Fankhauser
>
> Wavelinc Communications
>
> P.O. Box 126
>
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
>
> http://www.wavelinc.com
>
> tel. 419-562-6405
>
> fax. 419-617-0110
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>  So the AF5X just came out and already has approval and the
>> PowerBeams/Nanobeams have been out for a year and still no DFS approval?
>>   Any chance Chucks team can take over the PowerBeam product line?
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
>> *Sent:* Friday, March 6, 2015 11:17 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] UBNT OET action
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/tcb/reports/Tcb731GrantForm.cfm?mode=COPY&RequestTimeout=500&tcb_code=&application_id=222677&fcc_id=SWX-AF5X
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>  <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>>   ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Randy Cosby" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Friday, March 6, 2015 12:13:49 PM
>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] UBNT OET action
>>
>> Looks like the AirFiber 5X just got OET approval - 5160-5245, 5255-5324,
>> 5475-5720, 5730-5845.
>>
>> The powerbeams and AC stuff can't be far behind, right?
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> [image:
>> imap://[email protected]:143/fetch%3EUID%3E/Sent%3E33390?part=1.2.2&filename=Sunset-on-White-120.png]
>> <http://www.infowest.com/>
>>
>> Randy Cosby
>> InfoWest, Inc
>> 435-674-0165 x 2010
>> infowest.com <http://www.infowest.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to