Heard it in St Louis at the show.

Sent from my iPhone

Kurt Fankhauser
Wavelinc Communications
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
http://www.wavelinc.com
tel. 419-562-6405
fax. 419-617-0110

> On Mar 6, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Are you creating FUD or did you actually hear that? =P
> 
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I heard FCC is intentionally stalling on the power beams as punishment to 
>> UBNT for all the TDWR problems.
>> 
>> 
>> Kurt Fankhauser
>> Wavelinc Communications
>> P.O. Box 126
>> Bucyrus, OH 44820
>> http://www.wavelinc.com
>> tel. 419-562-6405
>> fax. 419-617-0110
>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> So the AF5X just came out and already has approval and the 
>>> PowerBeams/Nanobeams have been out for a year and still no DFS approval?   
>>> Any chance Chucks team can take over the PowerBeam product line?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Rory
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
>>> Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 11:17 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] UBNT OET action
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/tcb/reports/Tcb731GrantForm.cfm?mode=COPY&RequestTimeout=500&tcb_code=&application_id=222677&fcc_id=SWX-AF5X
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: "Randy Cosby" <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 12:13:49 PM
>>> Subject: [AFMUG] UBNT OET action
>>> 
>>> Looks like the AirFiber 5X just got OET approval - 5160-5245, 5255-5324, 
>>> 5475-5720, 5730-5845.
>>> 
>>> The powerbeams and AC stuff can't be far behind, right?
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> <image001.png>
>>> 
>>> Randy Cosby
>>> InfoWest, Inc
>>> 435-674-0165 x 2010
>>> infowest.com
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to