The impact of the 1:1 frequency reuse must be a big hit otherwise the LTE cellular companies wouldn't be fighting for more spectrum?
Sent from my iPhone Kurt Fankhauser Wavelinc Communications P.O. Box 126 Bucyrus, OH 44820 http://www.wavelinc.com tel. 419-562-6405 fax. 419-617-0110 > On Mar 6, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah. I do wonder what the tradeoffs are though. It seems like there would > be some level of self interference. > >> LTE supports 1:1 frequency reuse. Same channel everywhere. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> >> From: "Kurt Fankhauser" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 12:21:24 PM >> Subject: [AFMUG] Telrad Magic... >> >> So if we only have 50mhz (today) in the 3.65ghz band how can we fully >> utilize the Telrad Base stations to maximum throughput if you have more than >> 1 base station on a tower? Sounds like I would have to be running multiple >> 20mhz channels with this product to get these crazy high throughput numbers >> but it looks like if I want to put this on a tower and get 360 degrees I am >> going to have to use smaller channel widths for frequency planning which is >> going to result in lower throughput because of the smaller channels???? Or >> is it just magic and it will work anyway? >> >> Kurt Fankhauser >> Wavelinc Communications >> P.O. Box 126 >> Bucyrus, OH 44820 >> http://www.wavelinc.com >> tel. 419-562-6405 >> fax. 419-617-0110 >
