Ahh I see what you're saying. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 7, 2015 7:53 PM, "Jerry Richardson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The slants will be for the AF5X which will see the rockets -3dB less than > if the AF5X was on H/V > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Saturday, March 07, 2015 4:41 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Typical improvement when using 45* slant > > > > Rockets don't decide the slant/linear. The antenna does. So those "HV > Rockets" on the 45* antenna aren't HV at all. > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Jerry Richardson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I see I’m not ‘splaining myself adequately > > > > On a given tower, if I have some rockets (H/V) and I use a 45 degree > antenna, I should see additional S/N of x (3dB was my guess) between the > two systems. > > > > While that +3db would be welcome, I’m not counting it. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Saturday, March 07, 2015 3:50 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Typical improvement when using 45* slant > > > > Radios are different, but slant vs pol won't get you different signals. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mar 7, 2015 6:38 PM, "Jerry Richardson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Looking to put in an AF5X with the 45deg slant antennas. Was curious if we > would see any additional link improvements over the H/V Rockets. > > > > I’m just assuming we won’t to error on the side of caution. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jon Langeler > *Sent:* Saturday, March 07, 2015 3:20 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Typical improvement when using 45* slant > > > > if you have any links with oddball H/V signals, dual slant would level > them out a bit to be about the same on each polarity. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Mar 7, 2015, at 12:34 PM, Jerry Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Looking at using AF5X for a link with the 34dB 45* slants > > > > What kind of improvement would you expect to see over standard V/H > polarization? +3dB? +6dB? > > > > Thanks! > > >
