350/mo to get it done right and just worry about growing isn't hateful.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:56 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <[email protected] > wrote: > > Last I heard powercode wassnt really interested in less than 250 subs or > so. At least that was their min license...(which I think makes it > difficult to get started with them ) > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged network to > routed. (More Info) > Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2015 11:51 AM > > > First thing I'd do is fire up a billing system. Powercode or Visp are > going to be the two options I'd suggest you start looking at. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:45 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Pretty sure you have to have Nat for that to work... >> >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone >> >> ----- Reply message ----- >> From: "Brandon Yuchasz" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged network to >> routed. (More Info) >> Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2015 11:43 AM >> >> >> Alright so I have always said I am not proud too admit when I am >> uneducated in an area if it means learning something I need to know. So as >> embarrassing as it is Ill open to robe. >> >> >> >> All APs are Cambium FSK and we are now deploying the PMP450 as well. >> Backhauls are a mix of companies but we are looking to try and standardize, >> Cambium, and Ligowave are the most used. >> >> >> >> Ill just use one site because they are all evolved in a similar way. But >> we have several different sites that are all very similar. >> >> >> >> The site I would like to do first is Tower one, 5 FSK APs (PMP450 coming >> soon) This site has a shed no heat and my equipment at the base is secured >> in a locking large steel box. Think of a truck tool box. Backhauled to >> Tower 2 through Ligowave and tower two has 5 FSK APs and one PMP450. This >> site is really remote no roads and its all tied together in a weatherproof >> box. >> >> >> >> So no managed switches, Single IP and DHCP. Never went then way of >> NAT. >> >> >> >> We have no real monitoring for customers date use, we limit up and down >> speeds at the SM. We don’t shape no caps you get the idea. So existing >> equipment is useless for this process. Our customers are quite happy with >> the services but I am blind. I will most likely double my size in the next >> 6 months and I can’t keep doing it this way. >> >> >> >> Brandon >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy >> >> *Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2015 10:51 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged >> networktorouted.. >> >> >> >> Also, depending on your monitoring system, you should be able to track >> CPE and AP bandwidth as is. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The availability of inexpensive Mikrotik routers made this much less of >> an issue than it used to be. Even at micropops that I bridge, I put a >> small Mikrotik like a 450G or a 2011 there as a managed switch. That way >> it can be converted to routed, often without a truck roll. >> >> >> >> One question is how you assign IP addresses to customers. Static with >> NAT in CPE? DHCP? PPPoE? Do you NAT multiple customers to one public >> IP? This may determine which approach is easiest to migrate to. Router at >> each tower with block of public IPs? VLANs to central site with big >> central router? >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* That One Guy <[email protected]> >> >> *Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2015 10:23 AM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged >> networktorouted. >> >> >> >> not to hijack you, but there are some who maintain a fully bridged >> network and use VLAN instead of routing, this I am curious about, it may be >> a cost effective solution for you as well. >> >> >> >> I started our migration 4ish years ago and had the budget cut out from >> under me with only half the routers deployed, let me tell you, a 50/50 >> network sucks a great deal to manage. whatever you do, make sure you have >> all your routers on your desk before you begin >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Everyone seems to have lived through this evolution at some point. >> >> A bridged WISP is asking for trouble. >> >> >> >> How many APs and how many sites? Are the switches at the sites capable >> of supporting VLANs? That is where I would start. Either that or >> replacing the switches with routers. Personally, one router with VLANS to >> each AP via managed switches would be my preference. >> >> >> >> *From:* Brandon Yuchasz <[email protected]> >> >> *Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2015 9:10 AM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Looking for help converting from a bridged network >> torouted. >> >> >> >> I am looking for help converting our network from bridged to routed. This >> is something I don’t have a lot of background in but I also don’t want to >> end the process having a system I can’t fix so I will need someone that is >> willing to both do the work and teach me at the same time. Depending on how >> the process works in regards to time I am hoping to spend an hour a week >> working over the phone and through a remote desktop app. >> >> >> >> My main reasons for working on this now are I need to see bandwidth use >> per SM, per AP, and have better ways of tracking both long term. We are >> just to blind right now and starting to really grow again I need to get it >> under control now before we get to large. >> >> >> >> I am open to suggestions on routers but already had purchased microtik >> and butches scripts which after trying and failing to get it to work never >> implemented. >> >> >> >> Contact me off list [email protected] if you can help. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Brandon Yuchasz >> >> GogebicRange.net >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> > >
