There was some talk of enabling GPS sync on the eForce PTP110, is that something that is going to happen? with the 2.5ms frame, we should get latency closer to what flexible mode does, correct?
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > But the force110ptp can't sync so it should always do ePTP? PTP being > possibly better if you have a large scale of synced backhauls I suppose. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Dan Sullivan < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Matt, >> >> ePTP does not support GPS sync as there is no fixed frame. >> >> PTP mode is TDD based and does support GPS Sync. The 2.5 msec frame also >> will support GPS Sync. >> >> Dan Sullivan >> ePMP Software Manager >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt >> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:17 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] A note on ePMP 2.4 PTP mode >> >> > Just a quick note on the enhanced PTP mode of operation - >> > >> > You will see lower latency in most deployments as compared to the TDD & >> Flex mode of operation. However, in high interference coupled with long >> distance environments the flexible mode will do better in terms of tput. >> > At this time, this is per design but we will be addressing and >> incorporating some of the good stuff from our TDD/Flex mode of operation >> into the enhanced PTP to bring back the tput in the above conditions. >> > Please note that we are also working on a 2.5ms frame to reduce latency >> in the PMP mode of operation. >> > >> > Thanks >> > Sakid >> >> Looking at ePMP in 5ghz for PTP. Is there a way to do it WITH GPS sync >> to allow frequency reuse for PTP yet? Running out of 5ghz spectrum. >> > >
