Yeah, if I'm going to buy the 110PTP radio, which we know is the Sync
radio with it disabled!, then let me do PTP-only WITH sync. I can
understand they don't want us buying the PTP radio at half the price and
someone figuring out how to hack it into an AP. For PTP links, I would
spend the extra $ for the PTP radio whether I need the sync or not, may
need it in the future, so why not put it up now. And I'm talking both
ends, you never know if you have to swap masters for timing.
On 3/11/2015 5:13 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
I know... I was told they were looking into doing just that.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
It's software limited to not do sync. I'd like to see it limited
to being only a PTP, just allow the sync.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Mathew Howard
<mhoward...@gmail.com <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:
There was some talk of enabling GPS sync on the eForce PTP110,
is that something that is going to happen? with the 2.5ms
frame, we should get latency closer to what flexible mode
does, correct?
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
But the force110ptp can't sync so it should always do
ePTP? PTP being possibly better if you have a large scale
of synced backhauls I suppose.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Dan Sullivan
<daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.com
<mailto:daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.com>> wrote:
Hi Matt,
ePTP does not support GPS sync as there is no fixed frame.
PTP mode is TDD based and does support GPS Sync. The
2.5 msec frame also will support GPS Sync.
Dan Sullivan
ePMP Software Manager
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:17 PM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] A note on ePMP 2.4 PTP mode
> Just a quick note on the enhanced PTP mode of
operation -
>
> You will see lower latency in most deployments as
compared to the TDD & Flex mode of operation. However,
in high interference coupled with long distance
environments the flexible mode will do better in terms
of tput.
> At this time, this is per design but we will be
addressing and incorporating some of the good stuff
from our TDD/Flex mode of operation into the enhanced
PTP to bring back the tput in the above conditions.
> Please note that we are also working on a 2.5ms
frame to reduce latency in the PMP mode of operation.
>
> Thanks
> Sakid
Looking at ePMP in 5ghz for PTP. Is there a way to do
it WITH GPS sync to allow frequency reuse for PTP
yet? Running out of 5ghz spectrum.
