Well if it's dynamic it can go the other way! Following the demand. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 12, 2015 7:32 PM, "George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)" < [email protected]> wrote:
> Josh, I think you're missing something. If you do rings and a link goes > down, more traffic starts going the other direction, or reverses > completely. So IMO, 50/50 is fine because it's not full duplex and I don't > want to have to flip a link from 75/25 to 25/75 (or whatever options there > are). A link goes down, traffic changes and I do not want to take down yet > another link to fix perhaps a temporary issue. OR cause a much larger > permanent issue, e.g. config apply or reboot makes the radio(s) not come > back up. > > And AFAIK, the AF5X isn't capable of FDD. It's not your regular airFiber > with two radios, or separate Tx and Rx antennas, or whatever it is. > > On 3/12/2015 4:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > We're ISPs. Our backhauls don't really need any upstream other than the > upstream needed to sustain downstream. > > Could you first get an idea on what the benefit would be? If it would > be <5% additional bandwidth it doesn't make much sense. Sync isn't a big > deal to me unless I replace ALL backhauls with af5x which just isn't a > realistic possibility. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Chuck Macenski <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> There are no plans for airFiber dynamic framing at the moment. It could >> be done if you didn't care about having multiple units synced together (as >> the framing would be changing). I don't know how much more in one direction >> we could make this and meet DFS rules for those bands... Is there a need >> for this? >> >> Chuck >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Will there be? >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Chuck Macenski <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> No. Currently we support 50/50, 75/25, and 67/33 (either master to >>>> slave or slave to master). >>>> >>>> Chuck >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm talking half duplex, sorry. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kurt Fankhauser >>>>> >>>>> Wavelinc Communications >>>>> >>>>> P.O. Box 126 >>>>> >>>>> Bucyrus, OH 44820 >>>>> >>>>> http://www.wavelinc.com >>>>> >>>>> tel. 419-562-6405 >>>>> >>>>> fax. 419-617-0110 >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> If you're running them full dux, you don't need no steenking >>>>>> adaptive duty cycle... >>>>>> >>>>>> bp >>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/12/2015 12:53 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Does the airfiber 5X (or any other variation of AF) support adaptive >>>>>> duty cycle? Or am I locked down to 50/50 or 75/25 etc???? >>>>>> >>>>>> Kurt Fankhauser >>>>>> >>>>>> Wavelinc Communications >>>>>> >>>>>> P.O. Box 126 >>>>>> >>>>>> Bucyrus, OH 44820 >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.wavelinc.com >>>>>> >>>>>> tel. 419-562-6405 >>>>>> >>>>>> fax. 419-617-0110 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > >
