Of course, you can come on down and prove me wrong if you want to. If
you do I'll deliver a hand written apology for my doubting.
On 3/17/2015 4:15 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
No, I agree with Mark. "It would work in some places that seemed
impossible and not work in others that absolutely should have been fine"
Except I would expand the statement to all NLOS products, ever.
It's factual because it matches observed facts. That's the definition
of factual.
On 3/17/2015 3:33 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
I just don't think your answer is factual Mark, unless you were
exclusively addressing it within the context of 320 and 450, but you
went broader and beyond. I'd have said nothing if you had left it
between those two products.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP320 vs. PMP450
Eric asked about 320 vs 450, and I answered his question.
Not every question is a marketing opportunity for Telrad.
Mark
On 3/17/15 3:00 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
This, respectfully, is a view centered on limited experience.
Discussing range in exclusion of product and only as a function of
frequency, is, well, wrong. Lots of other things come in to play,
from power to specs. The 320 beats the 450 in NLOS for reasons
explained by basic math, better power and sensitivity, for example.
For the same reason, we beat both.
Second, re "WiMAX" being inconsistent, I'll bet you've never used
real WiMAX Mark. the 320 and Purewave were BOTH proprietary spins on
WiMAX. They were no more WiMAX than UBNT is straight Wi-Fi. There
were many BreezeMAX WiMAX users who experienced rock solid consistency.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
[email protected] 419.837.5015 x 1021
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
