Yes, that is true. But exchanging new information about new products can
be done without advertising. But it can be abused too...
-----Original Message-----
From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 6:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP320 vs. PMP450
And I thought you had to be an Animal Farm sponsor to advertise here.
Others have had their hand slapped for doing exactly this in the past.
Just my opinion. Running away now.
On 3/17/2015 2:13 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Eric asked about 320 vs 450, and I answered his question.
Not every question is a marketing opportunity for Telrad.
Mark
On 3/17/15 3:00 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
This, respectfully, is a view centered on limited experience. Discussing
range in exclusion of product and only as a function of frequency, is,
well, wrong. Lots of other things come in to play, from power to specs.
The 320 beats the 450 in NLOS for reasons explained by basic math, better
power and sensitivity, for example. For the same reason, we beat both.
Second, re "WiMAX" being inconsistent, I'll bet you've never used real
WiMAX Mark. the 320 and Purewave were BOTH proprietary spins on WiMAX.
They were no more WiMAX than UBNT is straight Wi-Fi. There were many
BreezeMAX WiMAX users who experienced rock solid consistency.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
