Horrible eh ? Even if incompatible it's only a 3db drop. Your links are 3db from working ? On Mar 17, 2015 6:24 PM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <[email protected]> wrote:
> That just boggles my mind. Why doesn't the 450SM work with both antenna > types then? Why would a cheap $100 SM radio have a more sophisticated > antenna design than a $250 FPGA radio? I can personally attest that you CAN > NOT hook up a 2.4ghz 450 slant SM to an AP that's running a V/H antenna. > Tried that with horrible results.... > > > Kurt Fankhauser > > Wavelinc Communications > > P.O. Box 126 > > Bucyrus, OH 44820 > > http://www.wavelinc.com > > tel. 419-562-6405 > > fax. 419-617-0110 > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> It works with any SM, there's nothing special about the antennas. >> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Any SM or just the ones that were made to support slant? >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Mar 17, 2015 8:51 PM, "TJ Trout" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> There was an explanation made that was over my head even with 20 years >>>> rf experience but basically the sm doesn't care sees them both the same >>>> strength and no compromise >>>> On Mar 17, 2015 4:35 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm curious to know what everyone is using for 2 GHz sectors. >>>>> Primarily linear vs slant but also OEM vs aftermarket sectors. >>>>> >>>>> PS. I heard through the grapevines that the (integrated) CPEs can do >>>>> slant and linear. Is this true? Is there no loss in signal regardless of >>>>> your AP/Sector being 90*/45*? If the patch antenna can do both, doesn't >>>>> that mean it isn't focusing on one or the other and had to compromise? >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>> >> >
