This one is actually running 6.27, I'll try upgrading it. Are the SFP ports affected by this bug?
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > 6.26 and 6.27 have CCR Ethernet errors. It's fixed in 6.28. > > Mikrotik should work with any SFPs as in no vendor locking. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Jason McKemie" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Friday, April 3, 2015 7:38:49 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Planet Switch Packet Loss > > > I do have a Cisco and a different Mikrotik I can test with. I'll probably > do that. The CCR is working just fine with the licensed radio that is > connected to it via SFP, however. > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is there another piece of gear you can try with the planet switch that >> isn't the mikrotik? >> >> The only reason I ask is that I always seem to hear about ethernet >> negotiation issues with mikrotik, and sfp issues with them as well - mainly >> CCRs. >> >> Haven't heard anything bad about the planet stuff to this point. >> >> On 04/03/2015 04:32 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: >> >> As a follow up to this, I switched the optics out to some standard >> (non-bidi) SFPs, and I'm getting similar results. Going to test with >> another routerboard instead of the Planet switch to see if that makes any >> difference. I've heard good things about the Planet gear, not terribly >> impressed at the moment though. >> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Jason McKemie < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm trying to link up a Planet industrial ethernet switch (IGS-10020MT) >>> with a CCR via SFP ports and bidi optics. I'm getting packet loss (~5%) >>> and the receive errors are incrementing steadily on the switch. Any ideas >>> what I can check here? Do these not work well with generic bidi optics? >>> >>> -Jason >>> >> >> >> > >
