I am looking for hardware and or service to agrigate multiple low end connections to make one virtual pipe that I can use for bgp since the smaller pipes can't speak bgp.
Can mikrotik do bonding reliably? On Apr 18, 2015 6:44 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm assuming a Mikrotik at a datacenter where you do BGP with a tunnel to > the destination router's IPs per upstream port. OSPF magic over the > different tunnels. > > *shrugs* > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:29:10 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream > > I'm not really clear on what TJ is looking to accomplish here. The > bonding of multiple fibers together I understand ... then the final "bonded > connection" would connect via BGP to an upstream provider? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Butch Evans > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 11:55 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream > > On 04/17/2015 02:46 PM, TJ Trout wrote: > > Anyone know of a service that can take several small business fiber > > circuits that don't support bgp and bond them and provide a bgp session ? > > I've not seen anyone do this commercially, but I can make this happen for > you if you like. Let me know if you want to explore this, as I don't have > this set up just yet as a commercial service. FWIW, I have done this on a > couple of occasions (minus the BGP), but even the BGP session should be > easily done. > > > -- > Butch Evans > 702-537-0979 > Network Support and Engineering > http://store.wispgear.net/ > http://www.butchevans.com/ > > >
