I'm not talking about any bgp stuff guys, I'm talking about the ability to bond several non bgp lines into one virtual pipe that is bgp capable (i.e. with a mikrotik in a data center who can give a bgp session) not talking about bonding multiple bgp capable lines, etc On Apr 18, 2015 4:54 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:
> No community support, no business. > > http://www.onesc.net/communities/ > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 6:42:08 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream > > I have used communities a lot... The problem is non-standard support and > no support at all from some of the transit providers… > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett > *Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 3:35 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream > > > > Must not have used communities much? You can exert a lot of control with > them. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 2:32:31 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream > > Yeah the inbound part I’m really skeptical over… > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Mike Hammett > *Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 9:43 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream > > > > Through communities, local prefs, etc. and a few upstreams, you can shape > your traffic quite a bit. The InterNAP box is the only one I'm aware of > that'll do inbound. Noction has a box that does outbound only and they were > working on inbound, but last I knew hadn't finished it yet. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:26:49 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream > > There’s a few of them out there.. I have yet to understand why I would > want to buy a big expensive box (and they are NOT cheap) to influence my > outbound BGP traffic, knowing that like humans, we can only influence > inbound BGP traffic a very limited amount. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2015 9:34 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream > > > > A few years ago some company proposed an appliance that proclaimed to > manage bgp for multiple circuits. Don't know if the they are still around. > I personally don't think it is a good investment as so much of the bgp > equation depends on the carrier. > > On Apr 17, 2015 2:47 PM, "TJ Trout" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anyone know of a service that can take several small business fiber > circuits that don't support bgp and bond them and provide a bgp session ? > > > > > >
