Just wandered across this site.  Pretty amazing stuff!
http://www.stealthconcealment.com/

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

>   ABS is better than Fiberglass from my experience in creating radomes
> out of both.
>
> The spacing between the radiating elements of the antenna and the panel is
> critical.  You might find a particular spacing that could even give gain in
> some circumstances.  It needs to be adjusted for lowest loss.
>
>  *From:* Peter Kranz <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 08, 2015 4:32 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Concealment Panels
>
>
> Anyone have much experience with molded concealment panels? On a
> particular structure, the tower owner added panels in front of our
> equipment to great detriment.. Looking for an alternative product that
> won’t crap on our parade.
>
>
>
> We performed testing today at 5.8 Ghz.. Here is a table of before and
> after signals for 5 customers we took measurements from
>
>
>
> Before / After / Delta
>
> HC -56.0 / -57.4 = 1.4
>
> RO -63.7 / -65.2 = 1.5
>
> WB -58.7 / -60.5 = 1.8
>
> SF -59.9 / -61.8 = 1.9
>
> GG -60.7 / -62.5 = 1.8
>
>
>
> As you can see the average attenuation of the panel was measured to be
> -1.68dB (a 20% reduction in signal level).. This is similar to the vendor
> provided attenuation number of 1.31dB for straight on and -2.66dB for 45
> degree
>
> [image: cid:[email protected]]
>
> 45 degree angle:
>
> [image: cid:[email protected]]
>
> [image: cid:[email protected]]
>
>
>
> -Peter
>

Reply via email to