True...but they will have a chart for the different load %. I always calculate off of 75% and it seems to be accurate and leave us some buffer. You could be conservative and use the 100% load value.
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > Will vary with load. > > *From:* Sean Heskett <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 28, 2015 4:34 PM > *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looks like a great deal on a backup gen > > Look in the manual for gallons per hour fuel burn. Then run that calc > against your tank size. > > > > On Tuesday, April 28, 2015, Ty Featherling <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> How would I calculate estimated run time per tank of fuel for this? >> >> -Ty >> >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Ty Featherling < >> javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> wrote: >> >>> I doubt it but it's the questions I don't ask or think I know that >>> always seem to get me. >>> >>> -Ty >>> On Apr 28, 2015 12:34 PM, "Seth Mattinen" < >>> javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/28/15 8:40, Ty Featherling wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is there any concern about sine vs square wave output on something like >>>>> this? I want to get one but don't want to run into a gotcha I am >>>>> unfamiliar with. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> It looks like an alternator. Is it even possible for a rotating >>>> alternator to output a square wave? >>>> >>>> ~Seth >>>> >>> >> >
