Okay, yeah, I guess the 10/25mbps thing might make sense for cameras... but
I still get the impression that this stuff is being designed for the WISP
market, if the actual market is camera backhauls, it would make sense to me
to be pushing features specifically for that market... then again, maybe
they do and I'm just not paying attention.

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:37 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> What do you mean by not optimize? 10/25mbps per CPE is fine if they're
> being used for single/quad-camera uplinks (of a few mbps each) to a central
> AP.
>
> I remember being in NYC and peering at the extensive camera deployment
> using a huge number of wireless links, most of those radios looked like
> Proxim. Actually NYC is incredible in many ways for RF (and everything
> else!), with 3-story buildings covered in cell sectors, hidden panels on
> other buildings' corners, a number of wifi-sector-looking deployments, etc.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: * Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
> *Sender: * "Af" <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Tue, 5 May 2015 16:35:18 +0000
> *To: *af<[email protected]>
> *ReplyTo: * [email protected]
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Introducing Tsunami(R) MP-835-CPE
>
> That makes sense, since I never hear of WISPs using Proxim. But doing
> things like licenses... why? doing things like limiting to 10Mbps or 25Mbps
> seems weird if the majority of these are being used for cameras... why not
> optimize the product for what it's actually being used for?
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Colin Stanners <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Exactly. AFMUG is mostly WISPs, I think Proxim just goes to camera
>> installer companies/conferences and racks up the customers there who don't
>> feel they need to research other options. Their products are usually very
>> reliable even if not too competitive in the value or speed department.
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think Proxim has found that government finds something and then sticks
>>> with it, no matter how better the alternatives. I think they mostly sell to
>>> camera backhaul applications.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>>  <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>>
>>>  <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, May 5, 2015 11:16:20 AM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Introducing Tsunami(R) MP-835-CPE
>>>
>>> It has to sell, there wouldn't be any other explanation.
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> There are a few vendors where I'm like, 'Why do they even bother
>>>> anymore?"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>
>>>>  <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>
>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>>>
>>>>  <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> *From: *"Colin Stanners" <[email protected]>
>>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, May 5, 2015 10:51:31 AM
>>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] Fwd: Introducing Tsunami(R) MP-835-CPE
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FYI... other than IP67 and mobility support (who uses that in
>>>> unlicensed bands?), this doesn't seem to have many advantages over the
>>>> ePMP, and likely will be quite a bit more expensive.
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Proxim Wireless <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:07 AM
>>>> Subject: Introducing Tsunami® MP-835-CPE
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                Value Priced | Uncompromised Features     Designed for
>>>> maximum value, the Tsunami® 835 is an extremely compact, cost-effective and
>>>> high power customer premise equipment (CPE) series that is available in two
>>>> license bandwidth variants 10Mbps (upgradable to 25Mbps) and 25Mbps.
>>>>         Key Features   High Power and Extended Coverage  The 835-CPE
>>>> has the latest radio technology implementations such as MIMO, OFDM and +26
>>>> dBm high transmit power radio, resulting in consistent performance even at
>>>> long distances, in Near and Non Line of Sight (LoS) conditions.   Advanced
>>>> Features and Guaranteed SLA  Extremely compact, the 835-CPE comes with
>>>> a plethora of installation tools that make deployments really easy and
>>>> hassle free. Additionally, advanced RF management and triple play QoS
>>>> support ensure minimal latency, jitter and consistent system throughput.   
>>>> Cost
>>>> Optimized  The 835-CPE operates in license-exempt frequencies and
>>>> comes at very compelling price points with ‘pay as you grow’ throughput
>>>> upgradable variants, enabling service providers as well as enterprises to
>>>> enjoy a quick return on investment.     [image: Explore Complete
>>>> Feature Set +] <http://info.proxim.com/COG00R0Se0mF00qz1h01T05>     For
>>>> any queries, please feel free to email us at
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> <http://info.proxim.com/K00h5FO00emT1SqzG0100T0>         Copyright ©
>>>> Proxim Wireless Corporation. All rights reserved.
>>>>
>>>> If you no longer wish to receive these emails you may unsubscribe
>>>> <http://info.proxim.com/u/m0000U1050hq1eGzOmV0FT0> at any time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to