I've been using 500% for the same reason....that's what got me results
similar to real measurements.
I wouldn't be surprised if it's just a statistical fudge factor, but I
was hoping to be a little more scientific about the adjustments in the
future.
Real tree studying types have formulas based on the number of stems per
square area and a sampling of the diameter of said stems. "500" is on
the right order of magnitude to be trees per acre....so I was curious.
On 5/18/2015 1:55 PM, Colin Stanners wrote:
To my knowledge there is no real unit of measurement, that's one of
the values which I've set (to 499% in most heavily-treed regions - no
round numbers so it's obviously something I changed, not a default
program value) to make RM's estimates better match results which were
gotten in the real world.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Does anybody know what the unit of measurement is for the clutter
density in Radio Mobile?
The column says (%) at the top, but I'm wondering percent of what?
