OK, Are there any guesses or opinions on what percentages to use for
different types of trees?
On 5/18/2015 5:56 PM, Colin Stanners wrote:
There's a huge number of factors; number of trees per acre, what kind
of tree, what season, what amount of humidity they have (that can
cause an aditional 10db of fade fast in certain conditions), how old,
how tall etc. A formula to calculate all of those would be
unnecessarily complex so a percentage based on matching field results
is the easiest solution.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I've been using 500% for the same reason....that's what got me
results similar to real measurements.
I wouldn't be surprised if it's just a statistical fudge factor,
but I was hoping to be a little more scientific about the
adjustments in the future.
Real tree studying types have formulas based on the number of
stems per square area and a sampling of the diameter of said
stems. "500" is on the right order of magnitude to be trees per
acre....so I was curious.
On 5/18/2015 1:55 PM, Colin Stanners wrote:
To my knowledge there is no real unit of measurement, that's one
of the values which I've set (to 499% in most heavily-treed
regions - no round numbers so it's obviously something I changed,
not a default program value) to make RM's estimates better match
results which were gotten in the real world.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Adam Moffett
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Does anybody know what the unit of measurement is for the
clutter density in Radio Mobile?
The column says (%) at the top, but I'm wondering percent of
what?
