That was my assumption. I wasn't sure if embedded would be cheaper or not
to put on the boards. Having more memory doesn't hurt either. I do like the
idea of picking my own memory.

I assume running on board memory generates less heat than an microSD slot?
On May 18, 2015 11:35 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <
[email protected]> wrote:

> There are solutions, it just comes down to bits per dollar.
>
> A SD card + socket probably costs around $5-6 to implement, including
> card.   For that you get around 4GB (4096MB) or so.  Plus if you're picky
> about the brand you can get a card with built-in wear leveling, etc, so you
> don't have to worry about that stuff.  But you have the temperature issue.
>
> For the same price, you only get 32MB (0.032GB) of soldered in memory.
> Would 32MB be enough?  Probably, but there are a *lot* of things you can do
> if you have seemingly unlimited storage.
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Vince West <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Is there no solution for embedded memory instead of a card slot? I am
>> assuming it is cost prohibitive or it does not work for your project.
>>
>> That being said there have been days in the winter where we see -5° for
>> days in a row. It doesn't happen often. Even with heat generated from
>> equipment, I am not sure how well it would work or how long it would last
>> being so close to the limit for extended periods of time.
>> On May 18, 2015 10:23 PM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The coldest that I saw INSIDE our enclosures this year (accordint to
>>> SiteMonitor internal temperature) was 0-C (32-F).  Last year was much
>>> colder but back then I was using the APC for temperature and backup, and
>>> that graph data has all been deleted.  I can't say for sure if the
>>> temperature in the box was lower, but I doubt it would go too far below 32
>>> with all the equipment and batteries in the boxes.
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Wouldn't the simple answer be to offer the device and SD card as
>>>> separate items?  Then on your site you say, "If you want to have storage
>>>> with the same industrial temperature range as the rest of my product line
>>>> then buy this card, or supply your own at your own risk."
>>>>
>>>> Everybody selling fiber to the radio with an SFP slot does it that
>>>> way.  I always buy their SFP module.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/18/2015 10:09 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   What is the lowest temperature that each of you would normally
>>>> expect to see in your enclosures?
>>>>
>>>> The reason I'm asking is that I'm in the process of developing up a few
>>>> new products.
>>>>
>>>>  To date, all of the packetflux products are designed with components
>>>> rated -40 to +85C (I.E way cold to way hot).    I'd like to retain this
>>>> rating, but I'm running into a minor snag:
>>>>
>>>>  For storage, I'm planning on integrating a SD card (probably microSD)
>>>> in a socket.   I only need a GB or so, and SD card memory is inexpensive at
>>>> that range.
>>>>
>>>>  Unfortunately, all the reasonably priced SD cards are only rated down
>>>> to about -25C or -13F. which are about ~$3 in qty.   "Industrial
>>>> temperature range" ones which are good down to -40C/F are available but
>>>> they add at least $30 to the cost for non-name brand, and even more for
>>>> known brands.  When you're talking about a $100 end-user price, a $30 1GB
>>>> SD card seems excessive - and probably isn't even possible if I want to
>>>> meet the $100 price with some margin.
>>>>
>>>>  So, I'm currently playing the 'what options do I have' game.   I hate
>>>> to ship a product only rated down to -25C/-13F, but I know for at least a
>>>> large chunk of my customer base they never see below this temperature,
>>>> especially when you add a watt of power dissipation in the case with the
>>>> device.  Which leads me back to my original question:  What's the lowest
>>>> temperature most people would expect to see inside their enclosures.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>     *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>>>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>>>> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com
>>>>  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>>>> <http://facebook.com/packetflux>  <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
>   <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>
>

Reply via email to