There were pictures somebody posted some years ago from Canada showing 
collapsed 300' 25G towers. I think that was during a major ice storm. I've 
heard of 300' 25G's but you wouldn't catch me climbing them. 45G would be iffy. 
I have one of those that is 200' I've never personally climbed but my guys say 
its pretty solid.


 
For footprint, figure guy anchors at 80% of the tower height in three 
directions.
 
 
 
John Woodfield, President
Delmarva WiFi Inc.
410-870-WiFi


-----Original Message-----
From: "Paul McCall" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 8:35am
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rohn free standing

Just a word of advice from a Florida boy… I wouldn’t build Rohn 25 over 150 
feet. We DO have two 190s in the air, but we beefed up the guying including two 
anti-twist sections (our own design).

Even on 120 ft. we do an anti-twist.

Rohn 45 is more suitable for 200ft + but at 250, I would be looking at Rohn 
55/65 for sure. (with anti-twists as well).

The Rohn site has all you need on footprints etc. Cost… texastowers.com can 
give you a quote

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of TJ Trout
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 3:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rohn free standing

I don't know why I wrote freestanding, I meant guyed, obviously.... Anyone know 
cost or footprint?

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Jerry Head 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
We have a 190' 25g
6 guy points.
Top section is above the last guy point....
I have been to the top several times, makes my palms sweat even now...


On 5/30/2015 6:34 PM, Chris Fabien wrote:

Rohn specs 25 for up to 190ft,n properly guyed they are fine. We have a 170ft 
25g with 5 guy levels and a torque arm on the 4th, very solid to climb.
On May 30, 2015 7:17 PM, "Mathew Howard" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
But just think how fun it would be to climb a free standing 200' 25G! Even 
guyed, I think it would be a rather frightening experience...


Reply via email to