Pretty sure we have achieved 60 meg with epmp and 20 MHz 

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone

----- Reply message -----
From: "Glen Waldrop" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP 10 mhz vs 20mhz
Date: Sat, Jun 6, 2015 7:28 PM


That sounds like the tower is receiving noise that the clients can't hear.



-----Original Message----- From: Craig House
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2015 7:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP 10 mhz vs 20mhz


We have deployed 6 towers to begin our new EPMP network and 4 of those towers 
have a full cluster of 2.4 90 degree EPMP sectors.  They are configured with 
ACS turned off now because in several cases they all ended up on the same or 
very close to the same channel.  I have Front back designations and non 
overlapping channels set up on all towers.  I have tried 40 mhz 20 mhz and now 
10mhz channels and while the customer stability has gotten better the more I 
play with settings I have kind of hit a point I dont know what else to try.  I 
have some that the uplink quality will vary wildly from 100% to 0%.  Most have 
gotten better since I went to a 10mhz channel.  Most of the customers get 12MB 
-30mb down in the wireless link test but the uplinks are as bad as .17.   What 
is the cause of this poor uplink quality?  Is it interfernece?  My one 5ghz AP 
does not have this problem but even with noise many of these customers have -50 
signals and oddly enough the ones with the great signals seem to be the ones 
that have the poorest link tests on the up link side.  I also have customes 
with -65 or -72 signals that get 5MB up on the same sectors?  Im scratching my 
head a bit on what the fix is for this?  Should I leave ACS on and change 
everything to 10mhz channels?  Will a full cluster with ACS on work all on the 
same channel?
I'm used to FSK where you pick your channel and any channels that are adjacent 
will cause problems with connected SM's.  So am I just applying old knowledge 
to a technology that it doesn't apply to?

Craig 

Reply via email to