I wouldn't say "through" but over a slight ridge for sure blocking visual LOS and intruding most of the 1st fresnel zone.
-Sean On Saturday, June 13, 2015, TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote: > How does LTE penetrate hills? This is the second or third "through a hill" > story in the last week? > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Patrick Leary <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> RSRP, it is a measurement. It is a truer number than RSSI, which is >> only an estimate (so I'm told). As Ken said, basically add 30 to get an >> idea of the RSSI value. >> >> *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID* >> On Jun 13, 2015 5:36 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> Yeah... something like that. Notice that is -108 CINR, not RSSI, like >> the numbers we're all used to. >> >> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> I think Patrick said to add 30 dB to Telrad signal numbers because >>> they were “per subcarrier” or something? >>> >>> *From:* Colin Stanners >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>> *Sent:* Saturday, June 13, 2015 4:17 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Do you want to see this stuff here? >>> >>> Patrick, I haven't been following Telrad but that's too incredible - >>> I can't see how -108, which is below the noise floor for any reasonable >>> channel bandwidth (20mhz+?) could get any reasonable speed, much less >>> those. >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Patrick Leary <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >>>> Should I resist sharing this sort of thing? If it's out of line, let >>>> me know Chuck. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> [mailto: >>>> [email protected] >>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] On Behalf >>>> Of Steve Discher >>>> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:51 PM >>>> To: [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>>> Subject: [Telrad] Another Telrad success story >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Not to flood the list with these but Zirkel is having great results. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ************************************************************************************ >>>> >>>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >>>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer >>>> viruses. >>>> >>>> >>>> ************************************************************************************ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ************************************************************************************ >>>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >>>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >>>> computer viruses. >>>> >>>> ************************************************************************************ >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >
