Witchcraft!
On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > You can put a probe and crystal detector in front of them and get RF > that way without connectorizing them. > 1/4 wave probe and detector on a scope cable. > > *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account) > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','li...@packetflux.com');> > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 07, 2015 1:29 AM > *To:* af <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Would like a 430 connectorized AP (and possibly a 320 > too). > > I'm currently in the market for an additional 430 and/or 320 AP for > testing purposes here. They need to be connectorized, as I will be using > them for sync compatibility testing by connecting them to a RF detector and > observing the actual TX transmission timing in relation to the input > synchronization pulses. > > Because I consider my 320/430 sync products to be nearing their end of > life (just due to the fact that we don't sell a lot more), I'm not willing > to pay an enormous amount for them. These will only be used on the bench > here, so ones that are cosmetically unacceptable but still work are > perfectly acceptable here. > > Send me a email off-list if you have one or both types floating around. > > -- > *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* > Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 > forre...@imach.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','forre...@imach.com');> | > http://www.packetflux.com > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> > <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> > >
