Sounds familiar... That's me invigorating the economy. Mike for President. ;-) Wait, I won't be old enough this election.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erich Kaiser" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 6:31:50 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp user throughput It could be a laptop issue, one time someone made fun of my laptop so I went out and bought an i7 laptop and now I can run speedtests all day long with no problem... Erich Kaiser North Central Tower [email protected] Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Nate Burke < [email protected] > wrote: I'm not doing any MT Queuing, the Only Queue is the EPMP QOS. I put a MT in Bridge mode at one of the customer locations for bandwidth testing after the customer was complaining about slow speeds. The MT BW Test to that Bridge runs as expected. It's reassuring that others are not seeing this. On 7/22/2015 5:43 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: <blockquote> Also, the two tests may be different. Speedtest.net type test may be saying I see packet loss starting at X Mbps so the rate is X, while iPerf type test may say I see Y Mbps goodput despite some packet loss so the rate is Y. This may be interacting with the queuing method, as Mike points out. Perhaps set the ePMP to wide open and see if customer results change, then set queue in Miktrotik and see what happens. From: Mike Hammett Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 5:30 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp user throughput I read it as using the ePMP for queuing, the performance is less than expected. Using the MT for queuing, the performance is as expected. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 10:57:18 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp user throughput If the Mikrotiks at the customer site are doing 40x10 but the customer devices behind the MT it doesn't really make sense to look at the epmp for your problem. It could be the Mikrotik's CPU, port, wireless or the customer device. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Nate Burke < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> I have deployed quite a bit of epmp, but most people are at my base package, 4x1 (using the radio qos to limit bw on different tiers). Of the handful of people that are on larger plans, 20x5 or 40x10, 2 of them, on different towers are complaining that they struggle to get over 10mb on a speed test. The radio rf link test performs at the assigned qos level, and I sent one of them a mikrotik to go between the poe and his router (qos 40x10), and udp/tcp tests to that are coming back as expected. However, I can be watching the router, and his interface plugged directly into a laptop only runs like 10x2 during a speedtest. Do both of these customers have something wonky with their laptops, or is there a setting in epmp I'm overlooking? Most of our epmp deployment has been FSK upgrades, so I haven't had much actual laptop time myself behind an epmp sm, as we just go on the roof and change radios. Nate </blockquote> </blockquote>
