They've got the resources to do it, would be nice to see someone undercut the existing players.
On Thursday, July 23, 2015, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > I have no idea but if it’s like other attempts I’ve seen from companies to > stack heavy CPU “stuff” into a router, then stability and any type of > scaling would be first concerns. DPI is a very complex item to see someone > like Ubiquiti jump into in my opinion… > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] *On Behalf Of * > Jeremy > *Sent:* Thursday, July 23, 2015 7:13 PM > *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? > > > > Ok, so now that deep packet inspection has been announced I'd assume any > NDAs have been lifted. Have any of you been using this? Any idea what > type of latency is added? That pricing model is a whole lot different from > any DPI tool that I have ever seen.... >
