Well it will be interesting … sure would be nice to see someone “disrupt” I agree … but there have been lots of folks try to provide “DPI” and fail badly as they didn’t really understand what they were getting into… and doing it on existing routers is usually the first mistake in my opinion…..
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 1:27 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? They've got the resources to do it, would be nice to see someone undercut the existing players. On Thursday, July 23, 2015, Paul Stewart <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: I have no idea but if it’s like other attempts I’ve seen from companies to stack heavy CPU “stuff” into a router, then stability and any type of scaling would be first concerns. DPI is a very complex item to see someone like Ubiquiti jump into in my opinion… From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> ] On Behalf Of Jeremy Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 7:13 PM To: [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> Subject: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? Ok, so now that deep packet inspection has been announced I'd assume any NDAs have been lifted. Have any of you been using this? Any idea what type of latency is added? That pricing model is a whole lot different from any DPI tool that I have ever seen....
